COLLEGE DIRECTORY       :      VISIT ELLER      :      LOG IN 
Eller College of Management
Eller College Home > EBR > Research, Analysis, and Publications > Articles and Updates
Economic and Business Research Center
Current IndicatorsArizona's EconomyEconomic ForecastEBR Database

Articles and Updates

Census Finds Over 16% of Arizona's Housing Units Vacant

2

graph

"The HUD/USPS survey recorded roughly 130,000 vacant units in Arizona’s six metro areas, compared to over 401,000 counted by the 2010 Census." 

 

 

1

March 14, 2011

The U. S. Census Bureau found 463,536 vacant housing units statewide as of April 2010.  That’s 16.3% of the housing stock.  Highest vacancy rates were found in La Paz County at 42.7%, followed by Navajo 37.4%, Gila 32.7%, and Apache 30.0%.  Pima County recorded the lowest at 11.9%.  Maricopa County was 13.9% and Pinal 21.1% (see Table 1).

Almost half of the vacant units (227,000) were in Maricopa County.  Pima County had 52,249, and Pinal County 33,632.

During the past decade, Arizona’s housing stock grew by more than 655,000 units, a percentage increase of nearly 30%.  The three “Sun Corridor” counties accounted for 82.6% of the new units.  Maricopa County added 389,048, Pinal County 78,068, and Pima County 74,172.

The Census found three times the number of vacant units than reported by HUD, which bases its estimates on U. S. Postal Service surveys.  The USPS counts a housing unit as vacant if no mail has been delivered in the past 90 days (the unit must also have been lived in and must be habitable).  This survey recorded roughly 130,000 vacant units in Arizona’s six metro areas, compared to over 401,000 counted by the Census (see Table 2 below). 

Table 1: Vacant Housing Units, U.S. Census, 2000 and 2010

  2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Total Housing Units Total Housing Units Vacant Units Vacant Units % Vacant % Vacant
Arizona  2,189,189 2,844,526 287,862 463,536 15.1 16.3
Apache 31,621 32,514 11,650 9,743 58.3 30.0
Cochise 51,126 59,041 7,233 8,176 16.5 13.8
Coconino 53,443 63,321 12,995  16,610 32.1 26.2
Gila 28,189 32,698 8,049 10,698 40.0 32.7
Graham 11,430 12,980 1,314 1,860 13.0 14.3
Greenlee 3,744 4,372 627 1,184 20.1 27.1
La Paz 15,133 16,049 6,771 6,851 81.0 42.7
Maricopa 1,250,231 1,639,279 117,345 227,696 10.4 13.9
Mohave 80,062 110,911 17,253 28,372 27.5 25.6
Navajo 47,413 56,938 17,370 21,280 57.8 37.4
Pima 366,737 440,909 34,387 52,249 10.3 11.9
Pinal 81,154 159,222 19,790 33,632 32.3 21.1
Santa Cruz 13,036 18,010 1,227 2,573 10.4 14.3
Yavapai 81,730 110,432 11,559 19,529 16.5 17.7
Yuma 74,140 87,850 20,292 23,083 37.7 26.3

Table 2: Metro Residential Vacancy Counts, Census and HUD/USPS Compared

MSA Total Addresses  
HUD/USPS Census 2010 difference
Flagstaff 47,006 63,321 (16,315)
  • Census lists fewer addresses for Phoenix and Tucson but more addresses for the other metro areas.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman 99,884 110,911 (11,027)
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale 1,861,080 1,798,501 62,579
Prescott 97,076 110,432 (13,356)
Tucson 454,038 440,909 13,129
Yuma 69,618 87,850 (18,232)
AZ Metros 2,628,702 2,611,924 16,778
MSA Vacant Addresses  
HUD/USPS Census 2010 difference
Flagstaff 841 16,610 (15,769)
  • Census finds 3 times as many vacant addresses than found by HUD/USPS.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman 7,067 28,372 (21,305)
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale 91,805 261,328 (169,523)
Prescott 1,386 19,529 (18,143)
Tucson 26,861 52,249 (25,388)
Yuma 1,944 23,083 (21,139)
AZ Metros 129,904 401,171 (271,267)
MSA Vacancy Rate  
HUD/USPS Census 2010 difference
Flagstaff 1.79% 26.20% -24.41%
  • Statewide vacancy rate is 15.4% according to the 2010 Census, rather than 4.9% reported by HUD/USPS.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman 7.08% 25.58% -18.51%
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale 4.93% 14.53% -9.60%
Prescott 1.43% 17.68% -16.26%
Tucson 5.92% 11.85% -5.93%
Yuma 2.79% 26.28% -23.48%
AZ Metros 4.94% 15.36% -10.42%

Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) based on U.S. Postal Service data (USPS), U.S. Census Bureau, and the Economic and Business Research Center in the Eller College of Management.

For additional information, please contact us.

| More